MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 2003

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2003
64.3% pass rate
from 4,221 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (10% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (36 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Operation (72 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension unit (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Bellows (49 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Levelling valve (21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.047% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.095% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Axles
      • 0.024% fail on Axle
      • 0.024% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Brakes (16% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (33% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (49% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.00% fail on Rbt (32% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.071% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.85% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (46% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.047% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums (46% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.024% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.024% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.095% fail on Electronic braking system (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.66% fail on Lever
      • 0.024% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.095% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.024% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.024% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.024% fail on Other components
  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (68% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.024% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.97% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.54% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.024% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.047% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.024% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (16% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.047% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.024% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.21% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
        • 0.047% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (93% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Driver's door (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Other passenger's door (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition (86% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Pipe
      • 0.047% fail on Tank
      • 0.047% fail on Hose
      • 0.024% fail on System
    • 0.66% fail on Chassis
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.095% fail on Panel
      • 0.024% fail on Body condition
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.024% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.12% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.024% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.071% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.071% fail on Load security (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Tailgate (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Tailgate condition (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Cabs
      • 0.047% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.024% fail on Floor
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.28% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.024% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.024% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.43% fail on Steering gear (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.095% fail on Other components
      • 0.024% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.024% fail on Pump
      • 0.024% fail on Rams
    • 0.21% fail on Steering column (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Steering play
      • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.071% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.024% fail on Motorcycle derived steering systems
      • 0.024% fail on Head bearings
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.071% fail on Airbags
      • 0.071% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (89% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.71% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.024% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle (42% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates (42% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.047% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Steps and stairs (32 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Steps (36 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.024% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.024% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages