Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2002
66.2% pass rate
from 3,583 tests in 2020
(29% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (21% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.028% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance (85% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (51% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.084% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (90% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (32% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums (46% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.028% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.028% fail on Lever
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.56% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.056% fail on Servos
      • 0.028% fail on Valves
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.056% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.056% fail on Servos
    • 0.028% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Other components
  • 15% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Suspension arms (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (34% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.084% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (30 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Operation (88 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension unit (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Bellows (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Levelling valve (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension rods (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Springs (98% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.028% fail on Mounting
      • 0.028% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.028% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 9.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Electrical equipment (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.056% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.056% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.028% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.028% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (38% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Joints
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.53% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.056% fail on Hose
      • 0.028% fail on Tank
    • 0.87% fail on Doors
      • 0.67% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.78% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame condition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Chassis (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Chassis condition (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
      • 0.056% fail on Panel
      • 0.028% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.084% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.028% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.084% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.056% fail on Towbar
      • 0.056% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.056% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.056% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.056% fail on Cabs
      • 0.056% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.056% fail on Undertray
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on View to rear
      • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.084% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Drag link end (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Power steering (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.084% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.084% fail on Steering coupling (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Steering play
      • 0.084% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (64% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested (77% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.028% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.028% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.47% fail on Compression ignition (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.056% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.056% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (29% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Prescribed areas (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
    • 0.084% fail on Airbags
      • 0.084% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.92% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.87% fail on Road Wheels (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.028% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.028% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.028% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.028% fail on Doors
      • 0.028% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors

Search Good Garages