Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results
Registered in 200068.5% pass rate
from 1,421 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(18% better than other 2000 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Electronic braking system
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(62% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(59% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.070% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.77% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (91% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.070% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.070% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(81% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake performance
(72% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
(12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(59% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs
-
0.070% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.070% fail on Lever
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.28% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.070% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.070% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.070% fail on Pedal
- 0.070% fail on Hand lever
-
0.070% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.070% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
6.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension
(36% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.99% fail on Ball joint (50% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(42% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.35% fail on Linkage
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.070% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.070% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint
- 0.070% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.91% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Bellows (76 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Operation (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Suspension unit (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Axles
- 0.21% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.070% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.28% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Mounting
-
0.28% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.070% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust system (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Transmission
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Joints
-
0.49% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.28% fail on Joints
- 0.14% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.070% fail on Flexible couplings
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.70% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.56% fail on
Doors
-
0.35% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.35% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.070% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.070% fail on Door condition
-
0.35% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Hose
- 0.070% fail on Pipe
- 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.35% fail on
Chassis
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Chassis condition (66% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
- 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Body
- 0.070% fail on Body condition
- 0.070% fail on Other body component
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(42% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
(49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2000 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(46% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.49% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.21% fail on Horn
- 0.49% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (69% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(79% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(79% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(79% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Position lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.070% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.070% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.070% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.070% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.77% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.070% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.070% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.070% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
5.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.63% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.21% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Other leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
(46% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end
- 1.5% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.42% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.070% fail on Operation
-
0.14% fail on
Steering gear
(86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steering box
-
0.070% fail on
Steering play
- 0.070% fail on Steering box
-
5.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
(31% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Bonnet
-
0.28% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
-
0.21% fail on
View to rear
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Seat belts
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Condition
- 0.070% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.070% fail on
Airbags
- 0.070% fail on Passengers airbag
-
2.5% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (52% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
0.42% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
-
0.42% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment