Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2000
64.9% pass rate
from 1,838 tests in 2020
(24% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.11% fail on Brake drums
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Brake performance not tested (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.054% fail on Servos
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.054% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.054% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.054% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Suspension (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (46% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (23 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Operation (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Suspension unit (28 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Bellows (123 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Pipes
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
    • 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings (54% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Suspension rods (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (40 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (98% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.054% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.38% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
      • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (35% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (34% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Prop shafts (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Joints
        • 0.27% fail on Prop shaft (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
    • 0.82% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
        • 0.054% fail on Catch
      • 0.33% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure (87% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (87% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar
      • 0.054% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.054% fail on Coupling
      • 0.054% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.054% fail on Chassis
      • 0.054% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.054% fail on Body
      • 0.054% fail on Other body component
    • 0.054% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.054% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition (41% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (33% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.054% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.92% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.054% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.38% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Steering (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (50% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.054% fail on Rams
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.054% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.054% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (95% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.054% fail on Airbags
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.054% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Size/type
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Attachment
  • 0.054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.054% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages