Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1999
62.6% pass rate
from 1,654 tests in 2017
(23% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Brakes (21% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes
        • 0.67% fail on Hoses (63% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.060% fail on Pump
      • 0.42% fail on Leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
    • 4.4% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.12% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Front wheels (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.060% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
        • 0.060% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.060% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage
  • 13% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts (48% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.97% fail on Wheel bearings (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Front
      • 0.060% fail on Rear
    • 0.91% fail on Air suspension (59 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Suspension unit (82 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Bellows (77 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.85% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 0.18% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (97% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Gas suspension (77 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension unit (77 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Axles
      • 0.060% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.060% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (46% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps (58% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Battery
    • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Fog lamp (63% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.54% fail on Horn
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
      • 0.060% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.1% fail on Emissions (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.8% fail on Steering (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering damper (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.060% fail on Steering box
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pump
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
  • 7.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (25% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (36% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.060% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (47% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.060% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (39% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (51% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.91% fail on Seat belts (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
  • 2.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (33% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.54% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers front (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.79% fail on Body condition (62% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Vehicle structure (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Chassis (59% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.060% fail on Access panel
      • 0.060% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.060% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.060% fail on Body security
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.060% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages