Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1999
68.6% pass rate
from 1,093 tests in 2021
(23% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.091% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance (72% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.091% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.091% fail on Pedal
    • 0.091% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.091% fail on Servos
    • 0.091% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.091% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Springs (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Mounting
    • 0.46% fail on Suspension rods (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.37% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Bellows (65 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Axles
      • 0.091% fail on Axle
    • 0.091% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.091% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.55% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints
        • 0.18% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
      • 0.091% fail on Pipe
      • 0.091% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.091% fail on System
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
    • 0.18% fail on Chassis (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis condition (85% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
    • 0.18% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Steps (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.091% fail on Towbar
      • 0.091% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.091% fail on Floor
  • 8.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
      • 0.091% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Spark ignition (32% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (32% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.091% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.091% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.091% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.091% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.091% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.091% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Transmission oil leaks (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Steering (51% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
    • 0.091% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.091% fail on Steering box
    • 0.091% fail on Steering play
      • 0.091% fail on Steering box
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.091% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages