MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 1995

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1995
68.6% pass rate
from 507 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
      • 0.79% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.59% fail on Joints
        • 0.20% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.99% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Pipe
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
      • 0.20% fail on Hose
    • 0.99% fail on Seats
      • 0.59% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.39% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.59% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.59% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Body condition
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
    • 0.59% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.39% fail on Chassis
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.20% fail on Towbar
      • 0.20% fail on Other towbar components
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.99% fail on Brake performance (86% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.59% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
  • 9.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.39% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.20% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
  • 8.3% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.99% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.79% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Operation (29 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Bellows
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Springs
      • 0.20% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.79% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.7% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Steering box
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Steering column
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres
    • 0.79% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.20% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages