MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 1995

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1995
65.6% pass rate
from 961 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 1995 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (29% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.83% fail on Horn
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.5% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
        • 0.52% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Servos
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
    • 4.6% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Front wheels (75% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
        • 0.10% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.10% fail on Stationary pin
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Emissions
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pipe
      • 0.21% fail on Tank
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Component mounting (82% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.52% fail on Front
      • 0.31% fail on Rear
    • 0.62% fail on Air suspension (56 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Operation (56 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
    • 0.42% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.10% fail on Location
    • 0.10% fail on Gas suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 6.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.3% fail on Steering system
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end (92% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Steering box (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.10% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.31% fail on Steering control
      • 0.21% fail on Steering column
      • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.31% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
  • 5.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (61% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.73% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.73% fail on Seats
      • 0.62% fail on Drivers
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers
    • 0.21% fail on Body security
    • 0.21% fail on Load security
      • 0.21% fail on Tailgate (11 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (45% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (61% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.21% fail on Towbars
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
    • 0.10% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages