MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 1995

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1995
64.0% pass rate
from 772 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
        • 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe
      • 0.39% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.91% fail on Doors
      • 0.65% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.78% fail on Chassis
      • 0.78% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.65% fail on Towbar
      • 0.65% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.65% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Floor
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition
      • 0.13% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Bracket
    • 0.13% fail on Cabs
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.26% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (65% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.39% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (86% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Linkage
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Reservoirs (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.13% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (79% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.65% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.13% fail on Bellows
      • 0.13% fail on Levelling valve
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.26% fail on Axles
      • 0.26% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Springs
      • 0.13% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.13% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
    • 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.13% fail on Steering column
    • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.13% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear
      • 0.65% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.26% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.91% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)

Search Good Garages