MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 1992

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1992
70.4% pass rate
from 213 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.94% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.47% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.47% fail on Horn
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.94% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.94% fail on Switch
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.47% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.47% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.94% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.94% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.94% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.47% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.47% fail on Servos
    • 0.47% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.94% fail on Door condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Tank
      • 0.47% fail on Pipe
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 0.94% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.47% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.94% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Body condition
      • 0.47% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.94% fail on Cabs
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Chassis
      • 0.47% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.47% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.47% fail on Floor
  • 7.5% fail on Suspension
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.94% fail on Axles
      • 0.47% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.47% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.47% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.47% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.47% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.47% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.47% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.94% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.47% fail on Operation
      • 0.47% fail on Steering box
    • 0.94% fail on Steering coupling (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.47% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.47% fail on Tyres
    • 0.47% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages