Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1992
68.4% pass rate
from 272 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Catch
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Mounting fixings (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Other body component
      • 0.37% fail on Body condition
      • 0.37% fail on Pillar
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
      • 0.37% fail on Tank
      • 0.37% fail on Hose
    • 1.8% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.37% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.37% fail on Floor
    • 0.37% fail on Cabs
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.74% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.74% fail on Air and vacuum systems (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Servos (17 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.74% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Switch
    • 0.74% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.74% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.37% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.74% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Axles
      • 0.74% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.74% fail on Springs
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.37% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.37% fail on Other components
  • 5.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.74% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.74% fail on Other components (14 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Steering component
        • 0.37% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.37% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.74% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.37% fail on Window
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages