Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1992
62.8% pass rate
from 285 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Battery (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Switch
      • 0.35% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.35% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.70% fail on Lamp
      • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.35% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.7% fail on Components
        • 4.9% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Reservoirs (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Hoses
        • 0.35% fail on Valves
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.70% fail on Leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Rear wheels (83% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (14 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.1% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
        • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.35% fail on Cable
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 10% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis
    • 2.5% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 0.70% fail on Passengers
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
    • 0.35% fail on Body security
    • 0.35% fail on Load security
      • 0.35% fail on Loading door
  • 8.1% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.35% fail on Rear
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.70% fail on Location
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.70% fail on Radius arms (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Component mounting (85% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Free play
        • 0.35% fail on Steering box
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.35% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
        • 0.35% fail on Steering component
    • 0.70% fail on Power steering
      • 0.70% fail on Other components
    • 0.35% fail on Steering control
      • 0.35% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.35% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.35% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Pipe
      • 0.35% fail on Hose
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.35% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.35% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.70% fail on Towbars
    • 0.70% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.35% fail on Towbar
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages