Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2017

85.8% pass rate

from 10,996 tests in 2021

(12% worse than other 2017 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

4.1% fail on Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Washers (75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.091% fail on Windscreen
- 0.064% fail on View to rear
  - 0.064% fail on Mirrors
3.5% fail on Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Size/type
3.4% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (90% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 2.7% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.027% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.21% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.21% fail on Brake discs
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance
  - 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.091% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.073% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.018% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.018% fail on Service brake performance (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.045% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.036% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.0091% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.0091% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.0091% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    - 0.0091% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Rigid brake pipes (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0091% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.064% fail on Flexible brake hoses (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.027% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.018% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0091% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.0091% fail on Pedal
- 0.0091% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.0091% fail on Valves
1.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.31% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.027% fail on Headlamp (94% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.036% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.0091% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  - 0.0091% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.0091% fail on Horn
- 0.018% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.018% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.0091% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.0091% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.018% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.0091% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.0091% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0091% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.0091% fail on Switch
- 0.0091% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.0091% fail on Reversing lamps
1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.027% fail on Airbags (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.018% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0091% fail on Passengers airbag
0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
0.53% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.48% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.27% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.018% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.018% fail on Other emission control equipment (21 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.018% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  - 0.21% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.0091% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.0091% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.045% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.018% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (37 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.018% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0091% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.35% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.20% fail on Transmission (96% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0091% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.0091% fail on Joints
- 0.045% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.027% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  - 0.0091% fail on Hose
  - 0.0091% fail on System
- 0.045% fail on Body
  - 0.036% fail on Other body component
  - 0.0091% fail on Body condition
- 0.045% fail on Seats
  - 0.045% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0091% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.0091% fail on Doors
  - 0.0091% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.0091% fail on Door condition
0.31% fail on Suspension (65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.018% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.0091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0091% fail on Operation
  - 0.0091% fail on Other components
- 0.0091% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.0091% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.0091% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.0091% fail on Ball joint dust cover
0.19% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
- 0.036% fail on Condition
0.055% fail on Steering (64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.0091% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.0091% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.0091% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.0091% fail on Other components
    - 0.0091% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.018% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.018% fail on Steering rack