Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.4% pass rate
from 6,355 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.8% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.079% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Front lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Rear lamps (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Fog lamp (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Battery
    • 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.063% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.047% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.031% fail on Brake back plates (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Front wheels (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Parking brake operation (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Gradient hand brake (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.094% fail on Pedal
        • 0.094% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.031% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Components
        • 0.016% fail on Pipes
    • 0.016% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.016% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Condition (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.016% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.016% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.5% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Rear
    • 0.66% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
      • 0.016% fail on Presence
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid suspension (53 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension unit (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes (170 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (144 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Levelling valve (234 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Front drive shafts (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Constant velocity joints (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Air suspension (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pipes (93 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
      • 0.016% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.031% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.031% fail on Shock absorbers (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Gas suspension
      • 0.016% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.016% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.016% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.016% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 3.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (21% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.047% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.47% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.24% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.016% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 0.44% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering system (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Steering box
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.079% fail on Power steering
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.063% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.44% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.28% fail on Doors (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Body condition
    • 0.047% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Body security
    • 0.016% fail on Seats
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers
    • 0.016% fail on Load security
      • 0.016% fail on Access panel
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.38% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on System
      • 0.047% fail on Cap
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.016% fail on Emissions

Search Good Garages