Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results
Registered in 201076.4% pass rate
from 6,355 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.
-
7.8% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim (76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.079% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Position lamps
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Front lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Rear lamps (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Horn
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Fog lamp (55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Direction indicators
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Flashing type
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Battery
- 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
-
6.7% fail on
Brakes
(20% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Hub components
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake discs
- 0.063% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.047% fail on Brake linings
- 0.031% fail on Brake back plates (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Leaks
- 0.047% fail on Operation
- 0.031% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake performance
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Front wheels (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Parking brake operation (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Gradient hand brake (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.094% fail on
Pedal
- 0.094% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.094% fail on
Pedal
- 0.031% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.016% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.016% fail on
Components
- 0.016% fail on Pipes
-
0.016% fail on
Components
-
0.016% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.016% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
3.5% fail on
Hub components
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.4% fail on Condition (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
- 0.016% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.016% fail on Valve stem
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Rear
-
0.66% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.016% fail on Condition
- 0.016% fail on Presence
-
0.49% fail on
Fluid suspension
(53 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Suspension unit (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pipes (170 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Other components (144 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Levelling valve (234 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.25% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Constant velocity joints (66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Attachment
-
0.063% fail on
Air suspension
(13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Pipes (93 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Operation
- 0.016% fail on Levelling valve
-
0.031% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.031% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.031% fail on
Shock absorbers
(97% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Gas suspension
- 0.016% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.016% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.016% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.016% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Wipers (21% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
- 0.079% fail on Mirrors
- 0.047% fail on Bonnet
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.24% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.016% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.016% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.24% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.44% fail on
Steering
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Free play
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Steering box
- 0.063% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
- 0.016% fail on Steering arm
-
0.079% fail on
Power steering
- 0.047% fail on Operation
- 0.031% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.063% fail on Steering operation
-
0.31% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Body condition
- 0.047% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Body security
-
0.016% fail on
Seats
- 0.016% fail on Drivers
-
0.016% fail on
Load security
- 0.016% fail on Access panel
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.11% fail on System
- 0.047% fail on Cap
- 0.031% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.016% fail on Emissions
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system