Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.7% pass rate
from 7,142 tests in 2020
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.2% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Brake discs (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.028% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.042% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.084% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.070% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.014% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.056% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Pedal
    • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joints (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.084% fail on Linkage
      • 0.056% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.59% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (49 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Suspension unit (51 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes (104 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other components (120 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Operation (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.014% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.41% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.028% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.014% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.25% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Individual direction indicators (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Position lamps (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Position lamp (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Reversing lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.1% fail on Visibility (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Wipers (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.084% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.070% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.042% fail on View to rear
      • 0.042% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 0.77% fail on Drive shafts (32% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Joints (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Prop shaft (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Flexible couplings (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Bearing housing (63 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Joints
    • 0.28% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.056% fail on Pipe
      • 0.042% fail on Tank
      • 0.028% fail on System
      • 0.014% fail on Hose
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.028% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.028% fail on Cabs (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Steps (68 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.014% fail on Chassis
      • 0.014% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.014% fail on Seats
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.056% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.098% fail on Spark ignition (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.014% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.028% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.014% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.014% fail on Undertray
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.042% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.014% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.056% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
    • 0.098% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.056% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Steering play
      • 0.056% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.028% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.028% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.41% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag

Search Good Garages