Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2009
70.9% pass rate
from 5,975 tests in 2020
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.033% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (64 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (148 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Suspension unit (57 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation (60 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Levelling valve (57 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Pipes (38 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Accumulator (138 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Bellows (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.050% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.033% fail on Shock absorbers (98% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Springs
      • 0.017% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.017% fail on Coil spring
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs and drums (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.033% fail on Cable
        • 0.017% fail on Linkage
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (37% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.050% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.084% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.067% fail on Service brake imbalance (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.084% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Rbt (92% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic parking brake (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
    • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.050% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.033% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.033% fail on Other components
    • 0.017% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (24% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp (25% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.017% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.59% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical equipment (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.017% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.050% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.017% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.017% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (20% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.49% fail on Spark ignition (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.084% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.067% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.067% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.067% fail on View to rear
      • 0.033% fail on Mirrors (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Indirect vision devices (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Joints (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Prop shaft (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Flexible couplings (44 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Bearing housing (76 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Joints
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Tank
      • 0.050% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.033% fail on Hose
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.017% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.017% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.017% fail on Carrier
    • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.017% fail on Load security
      • 0.017% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.017% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.017% fail on Seats
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.017% fail on Cabs
      • 0.017% fail on Steps
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plates (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.92% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.017% fail on Hubs
  • 0.72% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.033% fail on Airbags
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.54% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Other components
        • 0.017% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.084% fail on Power steering
      • 0.050% fail on Operation
      • 0.033% fail on Other components
    • 0.050% fail on Steering play
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.033% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.033% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.017% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.017% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages