Land Rover Range Rover Evoque MOT Results

Registered in 2017

88.7% pass rate

from 23,852 tests in 2021

(13% better than other 2017 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is unusually good or bad.

3.3% fail on Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition (18% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Size/type
2.7% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (42% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Brake pads (41% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.017% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.87% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.15% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.021% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.013% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.013% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.092% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.059% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.034% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.059% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.038% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    - 0.0042% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
  - 0.055% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.042% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.021% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (66% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Pedal
- 0.017% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (74% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.013% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.0042% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.0084% fail on Parking brake control (89% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0084% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.0042% fail on Rigid brake pipes
2.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Headlamps (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.77% fail on Headlamp (80% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.21% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Stop lamp (57% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.096% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.059% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.038% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.042% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.0084% fail on Horn
  - 0.0042% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.013% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.0084% fail on Position lamp
  - 0.0042% fail on All position lamps
- 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.013% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.0084% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.0042% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.0042% fail on Switch
1.1% fail on Visibility (71% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Wipers (78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.063% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0084% fail on Bonnet
- 0.0084% fail on View to rear
  - 0.0084% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0042% fail on Driver's view
1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (90% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (96% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.025% fail on Emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.021% fail on Particulate filter (27 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      - 0.0042% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      - 0.0042% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.0042% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  - 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (41% worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.0084% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.013% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.013% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Registration plates (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
0.32% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.14% fail on Transmission
  - 0.14% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.13% fail on Joints
    - 0.0084% fail on Drive shaft
    - 0.0042% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.096% fail on Doors (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.075% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.021% fail on Door condition
- 0.025% fail on Exhaust system (66% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.013% fail on Pipe
  - 0.013% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.017% fail on Seats
  - 0.013% fail on Driver's seat
  - 0.0042% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.0084% fail on Bumpers
- 0.0042% fail on Body
  - 0.0042% fail on Other body component
0.25% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.16% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.088% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0042% fail on Airbags
  - 0.0042% fail on Drivers airbag
0.22% fail on Suspension (75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arms (45% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.075% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Shock absorbers (63% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.025% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2017 cars)
    - 0.025% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0084% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0084% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0084% fail on Wheel bearings (85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0084% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.0042% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.0042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
0.16% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.0042% fail on Condition
0.034% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.013% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2017 cars)
  - 0.0042% fail on Locking devices
- 0.013% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.0084% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.0042% fail on Operation
- 0.0042% fail on Electronic power steering