Land Rover Range Rover Evoque MOT Results
Registered in 201687.6% pass rate
from 25,759 tests in 2021
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is unusually good or bad.
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(13% better than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (36% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Brakes
(11% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(32% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads (32% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake linings
-
0.92% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(93% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Brake discs (94% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(32% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Brake performance
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Decelerometer
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.043% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.027% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.039% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.043% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.066% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake performance
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.043% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.035% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.019% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.027% fail on
Parking brake control
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.019% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Pedal
-
0.019% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.019% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.0078% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0078% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0078% fail on Rigid brake pipes (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0039% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.0039% fail on Other components
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Headlamp (32% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.20% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Direction indicators
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Flashing type
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (52% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.0039% fail on Switch
-
0.16% fail on
Flashing type
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.027% fail on Horn
- 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0039% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.019% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.019% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.019% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.012% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0078% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0078% fail on Switch
- 0.0078% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(68% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0078% fail on Other emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.0039% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.34% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0078% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0039% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0039% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0078% fail on Other leaks
- 0.0039% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0039% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.0039% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.0078% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0039% fail on Sound deadening material
- 0.0039% fail on Undertray
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(68% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Visibility
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Wipers (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.054% fail on Windscreen
-
0.031% fail on
View to rear
- 0.027% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0039% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.0039% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0039% fail on Bonnet
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension arms
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.16% fail on
Springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.039% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Linkage ball joints (75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0078% fail on Shock absorbers (94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0039% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0039% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0039% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0039% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension arms
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Transmission
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.12% fail on Joints (37% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.0039% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.0039% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0039% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.0039% fail on Halfshafts
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.062% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Doors
-
0.050% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0078% fail on Door condition
-
0.0039% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0039% fail on Door condition
-
0.050% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.035% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.035% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.023% fail on
Seats
- 0.023% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.019% fail on
Body
- 0.016% fail on Other body component
- 0.0039% fail on Panel
- 0.0039% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Transmission
(34% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.0039% fail on
Airbags
- 0.0039% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.0078% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Steering
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.043% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0078% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on Other components
-
0.016% fail on
Steering linkage components
(93% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0039% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0039% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.050% fail on
Steering gear