MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover Evoque » 2011

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque MOT Results

Registered in 2011
81.8% pass rate
from 3,432 tests in 2017
(26% better than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (27% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.087% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.058% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components (58% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.058% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.50% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.029% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.029% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on ABS
    • 0.087% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.087% fail on Hydraulic systems (74% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Components
        • 0.087% fail on Hoses
  • 4.4% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (57% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.47% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps (81% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front lamps (86% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (70% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp (95% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Battery
    • 0.029% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.029% fail on Horn
  • 1.8% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
    • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.20% fail on Front drive shafts (61% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Couplings
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.029% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.029% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Front
      • 0.029% fail on Rear
    • 0.17% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.029% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.64% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.35% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.23% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Body condition
    • 0.029% fail on Seats
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers
  • 0.087% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (90% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.029% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.029% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.029% fail on Tank
  • 0.029% fail on Steering
    • 0.029% fail on Power steering
      • 0.029% fail on Electronic power steering

Search Good Garages