Land Rover Range Rover Evoque MOT Results
Registered in 201181.8% pass rate
from 3,432 tests in 2017
(26% better than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is unusually good or bad.
-
5.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(27% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers (59% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
(22% better than other 2011 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
- 0.087% fail on Valve stem
- 0.058% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
4.7% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
(58% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
- 0.058% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.029% fail on Brake linings
-
0.50% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.029% fail on Front wheels
- 0.029% fail on Brake operation
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.15% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.15% fail on ABS
- 0.087% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.087% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(74% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Components
- 0.087% fail on Hoses
-
0.087% fail on
Components
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
(58% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(57% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
-
0.29% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.47% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
(81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Front lamps (86% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear lamps (70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on All position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp (95% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.029% fail on Switch
-
0.15% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Battery
- 0.029% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.029% fail on Horn
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension
(68% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(77% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.44% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.20% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Couplings
- 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.029% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.029% fail on Universal joint
-
0.20% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.17% fail on Front
- 0.029% fail on Rear
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Shock absorbers
(89% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.029% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.029% fail on Condition
-
0.029% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(77% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.35% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
- 0.029% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
- 0.15% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Body condition
-
0.029% fail on
Seats
- 0.029% fail on Passengers
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.087% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(90% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.029% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.029% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.029% fail on Tank
-
0.029% fail on
Steering
-
0.029% fail on
Power steering
- 0.029% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.029% fail on
Power steering