MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Freelander » 2010

Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 2010
71.7% pass rate
from 14,740 tests in 2021
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.034% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.99% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators (33% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.061% fail on Side repeaters (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Semaphore (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Arm (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical equipment (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Horn (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.061% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.061% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.061% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Reversing lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0068% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0068% fail on Switch
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0068% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.095% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0068% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0068% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0068% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (17% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (14% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0068% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Brake discs (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0068% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Cable (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.047% fail on Pedal (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Electronic stability control (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Anti-lock braking system (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.027% fail on Other components
      • 0.0068% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.027% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0068% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0068% fail on Reservoirs
  • 8.2% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Springs (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs (46% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring (46% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0068% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension arm (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.088% fail on Other suspension component (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0068% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.081% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.075% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.041% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.034% fail on Sub-frames (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0068% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0068% fail on Axles
      • 0.0068% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0068% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0068% fail on Suspension unit
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Size/type (66% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0068% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.0068% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0068% fail on Other components
        • 0.0068% fail on Steering component
      • 0.0068% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Other components (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
    • 0.081% fail on Steering play
      • 0.081% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.9% fail on Visibility (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on View to rear
      • 0.061% fail on Mirrors (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0068% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.061% fail on Bonnet (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.047% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0068% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Compression ignition (21% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0068% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.068% fail on Spark ignition (97% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0068% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.061% fail on Fluid leaks (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Engine oil leaks (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.0068% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0068% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0068% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.041% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.020% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.014% fail on Joints
        • 0.0068% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
      • 0.041% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0068% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0068% fail on Catch
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.020% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0068% fail on Tank
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Body
      • 0.054% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0068% fail on Panel
    • 0.047% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.034% fail on Seats
      • 0.027% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0068% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.020% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0068% fail on Bracket
    • 0.014% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0068% fail on Coupling
      • 0.0068% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.014% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0068% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0068% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.0068% fail on Load security
      • 0.0068% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.0068% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0068% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0068% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.34% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages