Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 2005
54.6% pass rate
from 12,950 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (9.9% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps (12% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim (13% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.0077% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0077% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.6% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.39% fail on Individual lamps (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on All direction indicators (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.26% fail on Horn (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.054% fail on Lamp
      • 0.023% fail on Switch
    • 0.039% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.0077% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Brakes (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Components (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Cylinders (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.0077% fail on Pump
        • 0.0077% fail on Valves
      • 0.36% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (13% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (13% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Front wheels (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Parking brake operation (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Brake imbalance (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Gradient hand brake (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (25% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Brake calipers (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.015% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake control components (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.26% fail on ABS (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.031% fail on Components
        • 0.015% fail on Pipes
        • 0.015% fail on Servos
      • 0.015% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.015% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0077% fail on Operation
    • 0.039% fail on Mechanical components (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Cable (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Lever
    • 0.0077% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0077% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 13% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts (47% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (47% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Couplings
        • 0.0077% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.085% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.077% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.0077% fail on Universal joint
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment
    • 0.74% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Rear (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Front (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Tie bars/rods (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Location
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
      • 0.023% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Component mounting (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Subframe mounting (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.077% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0077% fail on Condition
      • 0.0077% fail on Attachment
    • 0.077% fail on Macpherson strut (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Axles
      • 0.023% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.023% fail on Clearance (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.039% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.039% fail on Condition
    • 0.015% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.015% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Tank (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Cap
      • 0.031% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0077% fail on Hose
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.8% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Track rod end (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Free play (83% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Steering arm (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
        • 0.015% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.046% fail on Other components
      • 0.023% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.023% fail on Rams
      • 0.0077% fail on Drive system
    • 0.069% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.015% fail on Steering control
      • 0.0077% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.0077% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.023% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Size/type (95% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (21% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.0077% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Requirements
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
  • 0.69% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (49% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers front (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Body condition (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Seats (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Passengers
      • 0.0077% fail on Drivers
    • 0.069% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.046% fail on Body security
    • 0.046% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.0077% fail on Access panel
      • 0.0077% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.0077% fail on Loading door
    • 0.0077% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.0077% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0077% fail on Chassis
  • 0.50% fail on Registration plates and VIN (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate (36% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0077% fail on Condition
  • 0.062% fail on Towbars (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.0077% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages