Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.6% pass rate
from 4,921 tests in 2021
(7.8% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies) (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.061% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.061% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.020% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.020% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance (44% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.061% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.00% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (51% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance (61% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.041% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Hand lever (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.65% fail on Electronic stability control (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Servos
      • 0.020% fail on Valves
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Servos (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Leaks
      • 0.041% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Valves
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.061% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.061% fail on Other components
    • 0.041% fail on Parking brake control (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Lever (90% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 19% fail on Suspension (12% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bar (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms (38% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (25% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (35% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Sub-frames (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings (31% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.37% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Axle
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.041% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission (30% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.041% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.020% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Prop shaft (27 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Bearing housing (34 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Flexible couplings (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (29% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.98% fail on Chassis (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis condition (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Other passenger's door (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Catch
      • 0.061% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.061% fail on Door condition
      • 0.041% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Tank (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
      • 0.061% fail on Pipe
      • 0.041% fail on System
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.20% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Towbar condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.020% fail on Coupling
      • 0.020% fail on Safety device
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.061% fail on Panel
      • 0.020% fail on Body condition
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.041% fail on Steps (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.081% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.020% fail on Bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Undertray
    • 0.061% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.061% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.020% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.041% fail on Window (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.020% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Steering linkage (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.061% fail on Operation
      • 0.041% fail on Other components
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Operation
    • 0.081% fail on Steering play
      • 0.081% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested (57% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.020% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.041% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.081% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.020% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.041% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.020% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.041% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
      • 0.061% fail on Requirements
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.041% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.041% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages