MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Freelander » 2000

Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.6% pass rate
from 1,038 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.48% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.096% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.096% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.96% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.096% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.096% fail on Brake fluid
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Anti-roll bar (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.77% fail on Suspension arm (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.77% fail on Sub-frame (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.096% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.58% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension rod (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.39% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.096% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.096% fail on Switch
    • 0.87% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.87% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.87% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 2.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Joints
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Prop shaft (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Bearing housing (74 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.096% fail on Halfshafts
      • 0.096% fail on Chains
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.096% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Tank
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
      • 0.096% fail on Hose
    • 0.58% fail on Chassis
      • 0.58% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Boot lid (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.096% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar
      • 0.19% fail on Other towbar components (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.096% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.096% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.096% fail on Body
      • 0.096% fail on Other body component
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (31% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.096% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.096% fail on Window
    • 0.58% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.096% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.4% fail on Steering (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 0.096% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.67% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.67% fail on Attachment
  • 0.096% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.096% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages