Land Rover Freelander MOT Results
Registered in 199946.7% pass rate
from 2,035 tests in 2017
(9.1% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Brakes
(53% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Parking brake performance (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Front wheels (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake operation (50 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Gradient hand brake
-
8.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(32% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Components
(32% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Pipes (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Hoses (48% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.049% fail on Cylinders
- 0.049% fail on Servos
- 0.049% fail on Pump
- 0.64% fail on Leaks
- 0.29% fail on Operation
- 0.098% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
8.2% fail on
Components
(32% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.0% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.98% fail on Brake discs
- 0.20% fail on Wheel cylinder (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.049% fail on Brake drums
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake control components
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Anti-slip (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Pedal
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.098% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.098% fail on Cable
-
0.098% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.049% fail on Operation
-
0.049% fail on
Components
- 0.049% fail on Servos
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.3% fail on Stop lamp (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.3% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.3% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
(48% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Matched pair (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Individual lamps (52% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.098% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.049% fail on Switch
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.098% fail on Switch
- 0.049% fail on Tell tale
- 0.88% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.098% fail on Switch
- 0.049% fail on Lamp
- 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.049% fail on Presence
-
4.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(27% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Component mounting
- 0.84% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.049% fail on Attachment
- 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(58% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Couplings
-
0.34% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Universal joint (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.49% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.59% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Wheel bearings
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Rear (70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Front (67% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Bonded suspension
(5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.049% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
(91% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.049% fail on General condition
-
0.049% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.049% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.049% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(68% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 12% fail on Emissions (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.54% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on System
- 0.15% fail on Pipe
- 0.098% fail on Hose
- 0.098% fail on Cap
-
8.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers (58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Mirrors
- 0.44% fail on Windscreen
-
7.6% fail on
Steering
(67% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Steering system
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.098% fail on Steering arm
- 0.049% fail on Steering box
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
(97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Other components
- 0.098% fail on Pump
- 0.049% fail on Drive system
-
0.29% fail on
Steering control
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.098% fail on Steering operation
-
6.5% fail on
Steering system
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
- 0.098% fail on Valve stem
-
4.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.98% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Requirements
-
0.98% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(43% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.93% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.0% fail on Body condition (50% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.88% fail on Chassis
- 0.84% fail on Engine mountings (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Doors
- 0.69% fail on Passengers other
- 0.098% fail on Passengers front
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
- 0.44% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Drivers
-
0.098% fail on
Load security
- 0.049% fail on Bootlid
- 0.049% fail on Tailgate
- 0.049% fail on Body security
-
1.0% fail on
Road Wheels
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.88% fail on Registration plate
-
0.049% fail on
Towbars
- 0.049% fail on Towbar