MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Freelander » 1999

Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.8% pass rate
from 630 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.63% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (35 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance (39 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Plate brake tester (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.95% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Servos
    • 0.63% fail on Air and vacuum systems (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Servos (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 0.63% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
  • 19% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.79% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.95% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.63% fail on Springs (73% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Coil springs (72% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Coil spring (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Axles
      • 0.16% fail on Axle
      • 0.16% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp (60% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.16% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (70% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.32% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.48% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
      • 0.95% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
        • 0.32% fail on Prop shaft (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.16% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Tank
      • 0.32% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe
      • 0.32% fail on System (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.95% fail on Engine mounting (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Engine mounting condition (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Cabs
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.95% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.9% fail on Steering (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.95% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.95% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.16% fail on Steering column
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.63% fail on Condition (68% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.16% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages