Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.0% pass rate
from 1,197 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.42% fail on Decelerometer (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.084% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.084% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.084% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.084% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.084% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.084% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.084% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.084% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.084% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.75% fail on Air and vacuum systems (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Servos (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.17% fail on Servos (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Valves
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.17% fail on Other braking system component
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp (40% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.50% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.67% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings (66% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.33% fail on Axle (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Springs (92% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.084% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.084% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.084% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.084% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (85% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (46% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Prop shaft (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
        • 0.084% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.084% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.084% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.92% fail on Chassis
      • 0.92% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.92% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.17% fail on Hose
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe
    • 0.58% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Bracket
    • 0.58% fail on Body
      • 0.58% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.084% fail on Floor
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.84% fail on View to rear (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Mirrors (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.084% fail on Other components
        • 0.084% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack (74% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering wheel (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.084% fail on Steering play
      • 0.084% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.92% fail on Condition (61% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
    • 0.084% fail on Condition
  • 0.084% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.084% fail on Doors
      • 0.084% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.084% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.084% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages