Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 1999
46.7% pass rate
from 2,035 tests in 2017
(9.1% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (62% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake performance (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Front wheels (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake operation (50 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 8.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Components (32% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Pipes (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Hoses (48% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.049% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.049% fail on Servos
        • 0.049% fail on Pump
      • 0.64% fail on Leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.098% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.0% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Wheel cylinder (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.049% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Anti-slip (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.74% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.098% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.098% fail on Cable
    • 0.098% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Components
        • 0.049% fail on Servos
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Matched pair (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Individual lamps (52% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.098% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
      • 0.049% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.88% fail on Horn
    • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.098% fail on Switch
      • 0.049% fail on Lamp
    • 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.049% fail on Presence
    • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas (27% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.84% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front drive shafts (66% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (67% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Couplings
      • 0.34% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Universal joint (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.59% fail on Tie bars/rods (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Rear (70% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Front (67% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Bonded suspension (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (91% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.049% fail on General condition
    • 0.049% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.049% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Emissions (79% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on System
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.098% fail on Hose
      • 0.098% fail on Cap
  • 8.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (58% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (67% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Steering system (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.049% fail on Steering box
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Operation (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Other components
      • 0.098% fail on Pump
      • 0.049% fail on Drive system
    • 0.29% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.098% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.098% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Requirements
    • 0.98% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.0% fail on Body condition (50% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.88% fail on Chassis
    • 0.84% fail on Engine mountings (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.098% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers
    • 0.098% fail on Load security
      • 0.049% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.049% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.049% fail on Body security
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.88% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.049% fail on Towbars
    • 0.049% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages