Land Rover Discovery MOT Results
Registered in 201682.5% pass rate
from 33,460 tests in 2021
(8.9% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Discovery is unusually good or bad.
-
4.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(24% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.099% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Headlamps
(27% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Headlamp
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.69% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Direction indicators
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.030% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.021% fail on Trailer electrical socket (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0090% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.021% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.021% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.0030% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0030% fail on Position lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
(9.0% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Condition (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (15% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.084% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.084% fail on Windscreen
-
0.042% fail on
View to rear
- 0.042% fail on Mirrors
- 0.030% fail on Bonnet
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
(21% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(31% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Brake linings
-
0.62% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(29% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Brake drums
-
0.021% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.018% fail on Cable
- 0.0030% fail on Linkage
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(34% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Decelerometer
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(46% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.090% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance (63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.036% fail on
Parking brake performance
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.0090% fail on
Decelerometer
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Parking brake performance (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0030% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0030% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.027% fail on
Rbt
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Rigid brake pipes (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Flexible brake hoses (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.093% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.093% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.066% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Lever
-
0.051% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.030% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.027% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0090% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.018% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0030% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.0030% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0030% fail on Brake fluid
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(31% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension
(39% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Suspension arms
(78% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Ball joint (57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.19% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.048% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Operation (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.036% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Linkage ball joints (73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.030% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0090% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0090% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0090% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0030% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0030% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.0060% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0030% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.88% fail on
Suspension arms
(78% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0030% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.0030% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.0060% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.27% fail on
Spark ignition
(44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0030% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.0030% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.88% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.024% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0060% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0030% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0030% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0030% fail on Undertray
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(57% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Prop shafts
(32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Prop shaft (61 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Bearing housing (57 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Flexible couplings (39 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Joints
-
0.066% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Bearing housing (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.57% fail on
Prop shafts
(32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Body
(90% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Other body component
- 0.012% fail on Panel
- 0.048% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Doors
-
0.024% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.021% fail on Door condition
- 0.0030% fail on Catch
-
0.012% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.012% fail on Door condition
-
0.0030% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0030% fail on Door condition
-
0.024% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.027% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.024% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.0030% fail on Tank
-
0.015% fail on
Seats
- 0.0090% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.0060% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.012% fail on
Boot lid
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Boot lid condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0090% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0060% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0030% fail on Safety device
- 0.0030% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0030% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.0030% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.0030% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.0030% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.0030% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.0030% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.0030% fail on
Load security
-
0.0030% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0030% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.0030% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.0030% fail on
Cabs
- 0.0030% fail on Steps
- 0.0030% fail on Undertray
-
0.64% fail on
Transmission
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(50% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Registration plates (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
- 0.0030% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.045% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
(39% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
- 0.030% fail on Condition
-
0.10% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0060% fail on Locking devices
-
0.033% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.030% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0030% fail on Operation
-
0.030% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0060% fail on Pipes and hoses (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0030% fail on Pump
- 0.0030% fail on Other components
-
0.0030% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.0030% fail on Universal joint
- 0.0030% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.036% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0030% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.0030% fail on
Doors
- 0.0030% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.0030% fail on
Doors
-
0.0030% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0030% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Land Rover Discovery 4 (2009 - 2017)
Imperious on and off-road, hugely practical, more desirable than the current Discovery, refined and high-quality interior.