Land Rover Discovery MOT Results
Registered in 200864.5% pass rate
from 6,174 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Discovery is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(16% better than other 2008 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint (26% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(28% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.065% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (95% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(41 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Operation (82 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.065% fail on Bellows (40 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.016% fail on Levelling valve
- 0.016% fail on Pipes
- 0.016% fail on Other components
-
0.40% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.18% fail on
Suspension rods
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Ball joint
- 0.032% fail on Suspension rod (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.097% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Springs
-
0.016% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.016% fail on Coil spring
-
0.016% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.016% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.016% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
3.9% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.16% fail on
Decelerometer
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.032% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
(78% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(72% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(24% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads (26% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake linings
-
0.84% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs (30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake drums
-
0.23% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Cable
- 0.016% fail on Linkage
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Electronic parking brake (25 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Lever
- 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Pedal
-
0.16% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.081% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Other components
-
0.032% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.016% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.016% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.049% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.016% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.016% fail on Valves
-
3.9% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2008 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (30% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.58% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.58% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Direction indicators
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Horn
- 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.016% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.15% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Position lamp
- 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.032% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.032% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
6.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.7% fail on
Transmission
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Joints
- 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.016% fail on Flexible couplings
-
2.1% fail on
Prop shafts
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Prop shaft (65 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Flexible couplings (48 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Bearing housing (79 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Joints
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.32% fail on
Doors
-
0.24% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.049% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.049% fail on Door condition
-
0.032% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.016% fail on Door condition
- 0.016% fail on Catch
-
0.24% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.065% fail on Pipe
- 0.049% fail on Tank
- 0.049% fail on System
- 0.016% fail on Hose
-
0.13% fail on
Body
- 0.097% fail on Other body component
- 0.016% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.016% fail on Panel
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.097% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.016% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.081% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.081% fail on
Chassis
- 0.081% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.032% fail on Bumpers (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Towbar
- 0.032% fail on Other towbar components (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Undertray
-
0.016% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.016% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.016% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.016% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.016% fail on
Cabs
- 0.016% fail on Steps
-
4.7% fail on
Transmission
(74% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.96% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.11% fail on
Emission control equipment
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (32 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.86% fail on
Spark ignition
(76% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Catalyst emissions (98% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.15% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Engine oil leaks (89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Condition (20% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
(35% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Wipers (38% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
0.032% fail on
View to rear
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.097% fail on Drag link end
-
0.032% fail on
Other components
- 0.032% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.016% fail on Steering arm
- 0.016% fail on Locking devices
-
0.26% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.26% fail on Steering rack
-
0.16% fail on
Steering play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
- 0.016% fail on Steering box
-
0.13% fail on
Power steering
- 0.081% fail on Other components
- 0.032% fail on Operation
- 0.016% fail on Rams
-
0.016% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.016% fail on Universal joint
-
2.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.049% fail on Requirements
- 0.45% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.58% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.58% fail on Registration plates
-
0.45% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment
- 0.065% fail on Condition
-
0.032% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
(10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Steps and stairs
(152 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Steps (152 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Steps and stairs
(152 times worse than other 2008 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Land Rover Discovery 3 (2004 - 2009)
Immensely competent in all environments from serious off roading and towing to motorways and country lanes. Handsome looks. Roomy, classy full seven-seater