Land Rover Discovery MOT Results

Registered in 1992
64.2% pass rate
from 405 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Discovery is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp (76% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Tell tales (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.49% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.99% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.49% fail on Lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.99% fail on Rear wheels (76% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.4% fail on Components
        • 4.0% fail on Pipes
        • 0.49% fail on Hoses
        • 0.25% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.49% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake discs (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Vehicle structure (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.74% fail on Seats
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
    • 0.49% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Speedometer
  • 8.4% fail on Steering (64% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Steering system (65% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Free play (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.25% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.25% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
        • 0.25% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Pump
    • 1.2% fail on Steering control (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering coupling (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Universal joint (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.9% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.49% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
      • 0.25% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.74% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.49% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.25% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.25% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.25% fail on Couplings
    • 0.49% fail on Panhard rods (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Axles
      • 0.49% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.25% fail on General condition
    • 0.25% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 6.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Seat belts (70% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Requirements
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (48% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions (62% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.99% fail on System
      • 0.49% fail on Cap
    • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (44% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (61% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages