Land Rover Discovery MOT Results

Registered in 1992
68.6% pass rate
from 299 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Discovery is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.67% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.67% fail on Horn
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Mounting fixings (16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Panel
      • 0.33% fail on Body condition
      • 0.33% fail on Other body component
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission
      • 1.0% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.0% fail on Joints
      • 0.33% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.67% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.67% fail on Door condition
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
    • 0.67% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.33% fail on System
    • 0.67% fail on Towbar
      • 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.67% fail on Floor
    • 0.67% fail on Cabs (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
  • 8.7% fail on Suspension
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 0.67% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.33% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.33% fail on Mounting
      • 0.67% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.67% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.33% fail on Pivot
        • 0.33% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.33% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.67% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Steering component (22 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.67% fail on Other components
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering box
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.67% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.33% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.67% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages