MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender » 2005

Land Rover Defender MOT Results

Registered in 2005
64.1% pass rate
from 4,438 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Side repeaters (42% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.045% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.068% fail on Battery(ies) (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Rear reflectors (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.068% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.090% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.045% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Drag link end (47 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Intermediate drop arm (56 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Lock stop (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering box (63 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Operation
      • 0.045% fail on Steering rack (93% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering box (117 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pump (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.068% fail on Rams
      • 0.045% fail on Operation
      • 0.045% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling (25 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Universal joint (25 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Steering column
  • 11% fail on Brakes (21% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.99% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.068% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Rbt (94% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.090% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (23% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (29% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (28% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.068% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.045% fail on Lever
        • 0.023% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.34% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.023% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
      • 0.023% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.068% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.023% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
    • 0.090% fail on Flexible brake hoses (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 10% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Axles (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Swivel joints/housing (83 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on King pins (75 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Stub axle (27 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension arm (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.95% fail on Other suspension component (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.81% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.52% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (71% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.023% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.068% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.045% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.045% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.045% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Prop shaft (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Joints (98% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Drive shaft
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Doors (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Other passenger's door (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Door condition (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Catch
        • 0.023% fail on Hinge
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
        • 0.023% fail on Catch
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
        • 0.023% fail on Catch
        • 0.023% fail on Hinge
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Hose
    • 0.59% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.47% fail on Chassis
      • 0.47% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.27% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
      • 0.045% fail on Mounting fixings (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Body condition
    • 0.41% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.41% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Other towbar components (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Vehicle structure (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Cabs
      • 0.068% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.023% fail on Steps
    • 0.045% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.045% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.023% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Bracket
    • 0.023% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.023% fail on Floor
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.068% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.045% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.068% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.068% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.045% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Spark ignition (99% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.023% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.023% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.023% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.72% fail on Fluid leaks (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Other leaks (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.023% fail on Undertray
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (34% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Tread depth (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Size/type (83% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.068% fail on Road Wheels (86% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Attachment (88% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Hubs
  • 0.023% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.023% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.023% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.023% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.023% fail on Steps
Read the Honest John Review

  • Land Rover Defender (1984 - 2016)
    The ultimate 4x4. Simply unstoppable off-road. Body panels easy to replace. Latest 2.2-litre diesel offers strong pulling power. Retains its resale value like no other utility vehicle.

    Search Good Garages