MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender » 1999

Land Rover Defender MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.9% pass rate
from 3,322 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (29% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (34% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Dipswitch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.87% fail on Rear reflectors (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.060% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.15% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints (66% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Swivel joints/housing (24 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on King pins
    • 0.99% fail on Other suspension component (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (75% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Mounting
    • 0.51% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.090% fail on Sub-frames (87% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover (31 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (40% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Prop shaft (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (95% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Catch (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Hinge (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Other passenger's door (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Door condition
        • 0.030% fail on Catch
        • 0.030% fail on Hinge
      • 0.45% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Hinge (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.87% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Driver's seat (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.060% fail on System
      • 0.030% fail on Hose
    • 0.42% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
      • 0.15% fail on Mounting fixings (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Panel
      • 0.030% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Other towbar components (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Safety device
    • 0.30% fail on Cabs (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.030% fail on Steps
      • 0.030% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.090% fail on Floor
    • 0.030% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.030% fail on Load security
      • 0.030% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.030% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.030% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.030% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 12% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Drag link end (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Intermediate drop arm (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Steering component (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering arm (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.090% fail on Lock stop (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.72% fail on Steering box (16 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Operation
    • 0.63% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering wheel (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Steering coupling (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Universal joint (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering column
  • 11% fail on Brakes (16% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance (63% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance (75% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.090% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Rbt (95% better than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance (94% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.030% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Other components
      • 0.030% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.51% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (64% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Anti-lock braking system (62% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Servos (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Leaks
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.090% fail on Servos (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Valves
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (58% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.060% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.060% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.030% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (62% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.060% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.060% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.030% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.030% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.45% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions (96% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested (88% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.030% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.030% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.060% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.96% fail on Fluid leaks (86% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (34% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (40% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth (70% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.030% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.060% fail on Hubs (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.090% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.090% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.030% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.030% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Land Rover Defender (1984 - 2016)
    The ultimate 4x4. Simply unstoppable off-road. Body panels easy to replace. Latest 2.2-litre diesel offers strong pulling power. Retains its resale value like no other utility vehicle.

    Search Good Garages