MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Defender » 1992

Land Rover Defender MOT Results

Registered in 1992
60.9% pass rate
from 1,618 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 1992 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (86% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (86% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (68% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on All direction indicators (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.31% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies) (84% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.68% fail on Switch
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
      • 0.062% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.49% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.062% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.062% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.062% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission
      • 2.1% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Prop shaft (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.062% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.062% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.87% fail on Passenger's seat (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Hinge
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.062% fail on Hose
    • 0.56% fail on Cabs (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Mounting fixings (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
    • 0.31% fail on Floor
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.062% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.062% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 13% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.3% fail on Axles (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Swivel joints/housing (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on King pins (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Springs
      • 0.56% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.37% fail on Mounting (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Coil spring (75% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.56% fail on Suspension rods (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames (80% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (38% better than other 1992 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (41% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 1992 cars)
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.062% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Brake linings (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Brake drums (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.062% fail on Linkage
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.68% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.062% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.062% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.062% fail on Servos
  • 12% fail on Steering (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Intermediate drop arm (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Steering component
      • 0.25% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pump (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Operation
    • 1.1% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Steering wheel (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering column
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility (29% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (50% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.80% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Non catalyst emissions (87% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.99% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Transmission oil leaks (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.062% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.062% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Prescribed areas (51% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.062% fail on Requirements
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates (80% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Tread depth (69% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.062% fail on Hubs
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.12% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Land Rover Defender (1984 - 2016)
    The ultimate 4x4. Simply unstoppable off-road. Body panels easy to replace. Latest 2.2-litre diesel offers strong pulling power. Retains its resale value like no other utility vehicle.

    Search Good Garages