Land Rover Defender MOT Results
Registered in 198963.1% pass rate
from 2,078 tests in 2021
(24% worse than other 1989 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(84% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(84% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (99% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (71% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.0% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(84% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(100% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(100% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Switch
-
6.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(100% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.048% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 0.24% fail on Battery(ies) (69% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.048% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
1.2% fail on
Hazard warning
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Switch (190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (100% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.67% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Position lamp
- 0.048% fail on All position lamps
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(84% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(46% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
(180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition (190% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.9% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Prop shaft (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.096% fail on Halfshafts (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.048% fail on Joints
-
1.9% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
(170% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Driver's door
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Hinge (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Catch
-
0.77% fail on
Front passenger's door
(180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.77% fail on
Driver's door
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Pipe
- 0.34% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Hose
- 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.096% fail on System
-
0.87% fail on
Seats
- 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.67% fail on
Body
- 0.38% fail on Other body component (180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Mounting fixings (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Panel
- 0.048% fail on Pillar
-
0.43% fail on
Cabs
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Floor
-
0.096% fail on
Towbar
(7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.048% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.096% fail on
Load security
-
0.048% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.048% fail on Tailgate condition
- 0.048% fail on Access panel
-
0.048% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.048% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.048% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.048% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.048% fail on Boot lid condition
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(37% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (92% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.4% fail on
Axles
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on King pins
- 0.24% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Stub axle (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Axle
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.77% fail on
Springs
-
0.48% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.29% fail on Coil spring
- 0.19% fail on Mounting
- 0.29% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.48% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.72% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.63% fail on
Suspension rods
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.38% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.048% fail on Linkage
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(37% better than other 1989 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(59% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.96% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(41% better than other 1989 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(43% better than other 1989 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(43% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested (110% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake performance
(79% better than other 1989 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
(89% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 1989 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.048% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
(89% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(37% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Brake drums (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Brake linings
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (68% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(130% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Hand lever
-
0.67% fail on
Parking brake control
(150% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(160% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Prescribed areas
(180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.096% fail on Other components
-
0.48% fail on
Prescribed areas
(180% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.34% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.24% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.14% fail on Servos
- 0.048% fail on Operation
- 0.048% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.048% fail on Leaks
-
0.19% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.048% fail on Servos
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
(29% better than other 1989 cars)
-
10% fail on
Steering
(170% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Other components
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Steering linkage (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Steering component (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Intermediate drop arm (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steering arm
- 0.048% fail on Lock stop
-
1.6% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.24% fail on Pump (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Rams
-
0.91% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.77% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Operation
- 0.77% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Steering play
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Steering wheel (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Steering coupling
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Universal joint (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Flexible coupling
- 0.096% fail on Steering column
- 0.048% fail on Steering shaft
-
7.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
(41% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Washers (41% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
0.048% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.048% fail on Windscreen
-
5.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(31% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.048% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.048% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.048% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.048% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Non catalyst emissions (73% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested (80% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fluid leaks
(190% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (150% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(31% better than other 1989 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Requirements
- 0.048% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(94% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates (93% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
1.3% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Size/type
-
0.24% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.24% fail on Speedometer
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.096% fail on Attachment
- 0.048% fail on Condition
-
0.048% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.048% fail on
Steps and stairs
- 0.048% fail on Steps
-
0.048% fail on
Steps and stairs
-
0.048% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.048% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Land Rover Defender (1984 - 2016)
The ultimate 4x4. Simply unstoppable off-road. Body panels easy to replace. Latest 2.2-litre diesel offers strong pulling power. Retains its resale value like no other utility vehicle.