Land Rover Defender 109 MOT Results
Registered in 198267.0% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1982 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Defender 109 is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
-
7.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
7.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.5% fail on Headlamp
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 1.1% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
5.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.4% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Tell tale
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Hazard warning
- 2.2% fail on Lamp
- 1.1% fail on Switch
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.1% fail on Rear reflectors
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
7.7% fail on
Position lamps
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.8% fail on Washers
- 6.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
4.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(9 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Pins and bushes
(7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Shackle (11 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Spring eye
- 1.1% fail on Anchor bracket
-
2.2% fail on
Pins and bushes
(7 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.3% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.2% fail on Rear
- 1.1% fail on Front
-
1.1% fail on
Axles
- 1.1% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(9 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.3% fail on Front wheels
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake operation
- 1.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.1% fail on Brake operation
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.3% fail on
Components
- 3.3% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Hoses
-
3.3% fail on
Components
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Pedal
-
1.1% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 1.1% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(150% worse than other 1982 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Body condition
-
3.3% fail on
Seats
- 3.3% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers
-
4.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 1982 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end
-
1.1% fail on
Other components
- 1.1% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.1% fail on
Steering control
- 1.1% fail on Steering column
- 1.1% fail on Locking devices
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.3% fail on Emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.1% fail on System
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Towbars
- 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure