Kia Venga MOT Results
Registered in 201584.0% pass rate
from 6,281 tests in 2021
(26% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Venga is unusually good or bad.
-
4.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.080% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.81% fail on Headlamp
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.30% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.016% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.11% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.064% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.096% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Position lamp
- 0.016% fail on All position lamps
- 0.080% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (86% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.016% fail on Switch
-
0.016% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.016% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
-
0.016% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.016% fail on Windscreen
-
0.016% fail on
View to rear
- 0.016% fail on Mirrors
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
(32% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Size/type
-
2.6% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(25% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(27% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (27% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Brake linings
-
0.57% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.57% fail on Brake discs
- 0.016% fail on Brake drums
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(27% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.048% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.048% fail on
Plate brake tester
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.064% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.048% fail on
Rbt
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.048% fail on
Rbt
- 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.54% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.032% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.048% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.048% fail on Pedal
-
0.032% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.016% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.016% fail on Leaks
-
0.016% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.016% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.016% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(25% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Suspension
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.032% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.096% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.048% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.016% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.38% fail on
Seat belts
(94% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Requirements
- 0.016% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.048% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Seat belts
(94% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Steering
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.22% fail on Track rod end
- 0.032% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.24% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(79% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Spark ignition
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Catalyst emissions (86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.064% fail on
Compression ignition
(86% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Spark ignition
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.048% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.016% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.13% fail on Registration plates
-
0.080% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Bumpers
-
0.032% fail on
Transmission
(92% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Doors
-
0.016% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.016% fail on Door condition
-
0.016% fail on
Front passenger's door
Read the Honest John Review
-
Kia Venga (2010 - 2019)
Spacious back seats and wide-opening doors. Easy to drive and park. Good visibility. Decent boot capacity.