Kia Venga MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.7% pass rate
from 2,995 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Venga is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.033% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.067% fail on Horn
    • 0.033% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.033% fail on Switch
    • 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 6.4% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear
      • 0.27% fail on Front
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on General condition (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Front suspension joints (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.033% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.033% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.033% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.067% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.77% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.067% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.067% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Rear wheels (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.53% fail on Electronic stability system (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Components
        • 0.10% fail on Hoses
        • 0.067% fail on Pipes
        • 0.033% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.067% fail on Parking brake (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on ABS
    • 0.033% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.033% fail on Lever
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.7% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.067% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Steering control
      • 0.033% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.033% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.73% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.43% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.40% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.67% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.067% fail on Body condition
  • 0.23% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.067% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on System
      • 0.033% fail on Pipe
    • 0.067% fail on Emissions
    • 0.033% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.23% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Kia Venga (2010 - 2018)
    Spacious back seats and wide-opening doors. Easy to drive and park. Good visibility. Decent boot capacity.

    Search Good Garages