Kia Sorento MOT Results
Registered in 200959.5% pass rate
from 1,829 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sorento is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (52 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.11% fail on
Decelerometer
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.055% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.055% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (44 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.055% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.77% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(47% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Linkage (91 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pivot (176 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.11% fail on Lever
- 0.11% fail on Relay lever (164 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
0.49% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Brake discs (57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pedal
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.055% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.055% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Servos (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.055% fail on Servos
- 0.055% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.055% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
-
7.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Anti-roll bar (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Linkage
- 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Springs
(92% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.38% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.055% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.055% fail on Ball joint
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.055% fail on Dipswitch
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.27% fail on Position lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Direction indicators
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.055% fail on Steering arm
-
0.055% fail on
Other components
- 0.055% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.055% fail on Locking devices
-
0.82% fail on
Steering gear
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering play
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Other components
-
5.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
- 0.055% fail on Bonnet
-
0.055% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.055% fail on Windscreen
-
4.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.4% fail on
Transmission
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Prop shaft (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Drive shafts
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Joints (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Drive shaft
-
1.5% fail on
Prop shafts
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
-
0.49% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
- 0.055% fail on Catch
- 0.055% fail on Pillar
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Chassis
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Spare wheel
(21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Carrier
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.055% fail on Bumpers
-
2.4% fail on
Transmission
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Size/type
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(36% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(63% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.77% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.055% fail on Attachment
- 0.055% fail on Requirements
- 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.66% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.66% fail on Registration plates
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Belt(s)/padding (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Kia Sorento (2003 - 2009)
Has the hardware and ability for serious off-roading. Easy-going, pleasant drive. Useful tow car. Owners like them. Excellent value.