MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » Sedona » 2010

Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.8% pass rate
from 957 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.10% fail on Mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.84% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.42% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.84% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Cable
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Air and vacuum systems (40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Servos (51 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.31% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
    • 0.21% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.10% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.9% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Other passenger's door (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.73% fail on Transmission
      • 0.73% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.73% fail on Joints
    • 0.63% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Passenger's seat (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.10% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.42% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.42% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.94% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Kia Sedona (2006 - 2012)
    Seven adult-friendly seats as standard, huge boot as a five-seater, twin sliding side doors, well equipped and easy to drive, comfortable ride.

    Search Good Garages