Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.6% pass rate
from 923 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Battery
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.87% fail on Components
        • 0.76% fail on Pipes
        • 0.11% fail on Servos
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 4.3% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.98% fail on Coil springs (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 0.76% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.54% fail on Front
    • 0.43% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.43% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.43% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 0.76% fail on Steering system
      • 0.76% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.65% fail on Power steering (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Other components (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers other (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Body condition
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.65% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
  • 0.54% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.33% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

  • Kia Sedona (2006 - 2012)
    Seven adult-friendly seats as standard, huge boot as a five-seater, twin sliding side doors, well equipped and easy to drive, comfortable ride.

    Search Good Garages