Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.3% pass rate
from 1,035 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.58% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.097% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.097% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.097% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.097% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.097% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.097% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.097% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.39% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
      • 0.097% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.097% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.097% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.097% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Springs (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.39% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.097% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.097% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.097% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.097% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.097% fail on View to rear
      • 0.097% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.87% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other passenger's door (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.68% fail on Transmission
      • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.58% fail on Joints
        • 0.097% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.68% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Passenger's seat (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.48% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Boot lid (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.097% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.097% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.097% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.097% fail on Body
      • 0.097% fail on Body condition
      • 0.097% fail on Other body component
    • 0.097% fail on Undertray
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 0.87% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Operation
      • 0.097% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.097% fail on Rams
  • 0.77% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Exhaust emissions (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.097% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.097% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Kia Sedona (2006 - 2012)
    Seven adult-friendly seats as standard, huge boot as a five-seater, twin sliding side doors, well equipped and easy to drive, comfortable ride.

    Search Good Garages