Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2005
46.2% pass rate
from 2,009 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.55% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums (60% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.45% fail on Cable
        • 0.050% fail on Lever
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.55% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.100% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.050% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.050% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.050% fail on Other components
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.100% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.00% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.00% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.00% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.050% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Suspension arms (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Suspension arm (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.050% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers (47% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.050% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.050% fail on Axles
      • 0.050% fail on Axle
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.050% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Condition (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.050% fail on Drive shaft
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
      • 0.100% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.100% fail on System
    • 0.40% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
      • 0.050% fail on Body condition
      • 0.050% fail on Panel
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Vehicle structure (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.100% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.100% fail on Door condition
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
      • 0.050% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Carrier (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Bracket (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Steps
    • 0.050% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.050% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 10% fail on Tyres (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 9.7% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.100% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pump (24 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Rams
    • 0.90% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.70% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Steering box
    • 0.30% fail on Steering play
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering coupling (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Universal joint (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Steering wheel
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.100% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.100% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.100% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (55% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.050% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.050% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.050% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Catalyst emissions (95% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.100% fail on Seat belt installation check (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Belt(s)/padding (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.050% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.050% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.050% fail on Steps

Search Good Garages