MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » Sedona » 2005

Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2005
46.1% pass rate
from 1,001 tests in 2021
(24% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.100% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.80% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.00% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Cable
        • 0.100% fail on Lever
    • 4.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.70% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.100% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.100% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.90% fail on Springs (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Mounting
        • 0.100% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Axles
      • 0.20% fail on Axle (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.100% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.60% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.100% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.100% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.100% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.100% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
    • 0.70% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank
      • 0.100% fail on Hose
    • 0.30% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
      • 0.100% fail on Other body component
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.100% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.100% fail on Bracket
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.100% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.100% fail on Door condition
      • 0.100% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.100% fail on Door condition
    • 0.100% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.100% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.100% fail on Carrier
    • 0.100% fail on Towbar
      • 0.100% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.100% fail on Floor
    • 0.100% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.100% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.100% fail on Cabs
      • 0.100% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
    • 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.100% fail on Airbags
      • 0.100% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 9.4% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering linkage components (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.90% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.100% fail on Operation
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Other components
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.100% fail on Operation
      • 0.100% fail on Pump
      • 0.100% fail on Rams
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.100% fail on Steering column
    • 0.100% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.100% fail on Universal joint
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on View to rear
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.100% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.100% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.100% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.100% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Spark ignition (96% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.70% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.100% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages