Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2003
37.9% pass rate
from 1,452 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 31% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 25% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 16% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Brake operation
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Components (73% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.55% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Fitment
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on ABS (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.069% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.069% fail on Components
        • 0.069% fail on Pipes
  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (20% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.96% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp (42% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.069% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 30% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Couplings (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.069% fail on Drive shafts
    • 8.2% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Front (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (40 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.83% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (35 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 12% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.41% fail on Free play (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.069% fail on Other components
        • 0.069% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.14% fail on Rams (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering coupling (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Universal joint (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.28% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
  • 12% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 6.2% fail on Condition (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (28% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.41% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.069% fail on Hose
      • 0.069% fail on Cap
    • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers
    • 0.069% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.069% fail on Body security
    • 0.069% fail on Load security
      • 0.069% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.069% fail on Spare wheel
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.41% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.83% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.83% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.69% fail on Towbars (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages