Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2003
42.9% pass rate
from 679 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 28% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 23% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.29% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (69% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (70% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.29% fail on Cable
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (90% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.88% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
    • 0.74% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.15% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.15% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 23% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Belts
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Catch
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Body
      • 0.29% fail on Other body component
      • 0.15% fail on Body condition
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.15% fail on Carrier
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.15% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamps (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp (55% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.29% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 22% fail on Suspension (22% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Suspension arm (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Coil springs (75% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.59% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 12% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
    • 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Rams
    • 0.29% fail on Steering play
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering shaft
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Spark ignition (96% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Other leaks (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages