Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2002
44.0% pass rate
from 75 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 21% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 21% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 11% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 8.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 8.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 8.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 17% fail on Seat belts (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Airbags
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 1.3% fail on Panel
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 5.3% fail on Washers
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 6.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)

Search Good Garages