MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » Sedona » 2000

Kia Sedona MOT Results

Registered in 2000
27.5% pass rate
from 51 tests in 2017
(47% worse than other 2000 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Sedona is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
  • 33% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 29% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 18% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 16% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 7.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.9% fail on Components
        • 5.9% fail on Pipes
      • 2.0% fail on Leaks
    • 2.0% fail on ABS
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.8% fail on Component mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 5.9% fail on Tie bars/rods (22 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 20% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 20% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 18% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Steering system
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 7.8% fail on Power steering (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Operation (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Pump (106 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Other components
  • 16% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Passengers other (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Emissions
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on System
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Size/type
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages