MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » Rio » 2010

Kia Rio MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.6% pass rate
from 7,208 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Rio is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Other components
    • 0.014% fail on Steering play
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
  • 10% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Linkage (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.36% fail on Springs (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.055% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.069% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.069% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 10% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.80% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (45% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.014% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.014% fail on Cable
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
      • 0.014% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.069% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.069% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.069% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
  • 9.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.62% fail on Electrical equipment (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.028% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.25% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.069% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.055% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.014% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.014% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.014% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.055% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
    • 0.097% fail on Body
      • 0.097% fail on Other body component
    • 0.083% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.083% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.083% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.028% fail on Chassis
      • 0.028% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.014% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.014% fail on Doors
      • 0.014% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Spark ignition (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.72% fail on Compression ignition (43% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.042% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.42% fail on Fluid leaks (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.028% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages