MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » pro_cee'd » 2010

Kia pro_cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.7% pass rate
from 483 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia pro_cee'd is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.41% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 14% fail on Brakes (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.62% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.21% fail on Brake drums
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Hand lever (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.83% fail on Lever
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.41% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.21% fail on Mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.21% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.83% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.41% fail on Body
      • 0.41% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.21% fail on Steering column
    • 0.21% fail on Steering play
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages