Kia pro_cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2010

54.7% pass rate

from 530 tests in 2020

(33% worse than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia pro_cee'd is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamps (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Headlamp (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Position lamps (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.2% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.1% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.94% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.94% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.57% fail on Switch (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.75% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Horn
- 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
13% fail on Brakes (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.8% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.57% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 4.0% fail on Brake pads
    - 0.19% fail on Brake linings
  - 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.9% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.38% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.19% fail on Cable
    - 0.19% fail on Lever
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.57% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.57% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
13% fail on Suspension
- 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 2.1% fail on Springs
  - 2.1% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.75% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
9.8% fail on Tyres (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Condition
8.3% fail on Visibility (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.19% fail on Bonnet
4.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.3% fail on Joints
  - 0.57% fail on Prop shafts (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.57% fail on Joints (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.57% fail on Tank (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.38% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.19% fail on Doors
  - 0.19% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.19% fail on Door condition
3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.19% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  - 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.19% fail on Condition
0.38% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.38% fail on Track rod end
0.38% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment