Kia pro_cee'd MOT Results
Registered in 201058.9% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2017
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia pro_cee'd is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(99% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Rear lamps
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.85% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.21% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.21% fail on Battery
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(64% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(83% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Front wheels (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on ABS
-
5.1% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension
-
4.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Location (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.85% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.21% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
4.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(57% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.43% fail on Bonnet
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
0.43% fail on
Steering
-
0.43% fail on
Steering system
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack
- 0.21% fail on Track rod end
-
0.43% fail on
Steering system
-
0.43% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.43% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.43% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.43% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.43% fail on Registration plate
-
0.21% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Tank
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system