Kia pro_cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.9% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2017
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia pro_cee'd is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.85% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.21% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Battery
  • 11% fail on Tyres (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 10% fail on Brakes (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.43% fail on Location (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.85% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.43% fail on Steering
    • 0.43% fail on Steering system
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.43% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.43% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.43% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.43% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Tank

Search Good Garages