MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » pro_cee'd » 2009

Kia pro_cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2009
49.6% pass rate
from 274 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia pro_cee'd is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.36% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.73% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 15% fail on Brakes (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.3% fail on Parking brake control (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 11% fail on Visibility (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
  • 11% fail on Tyres (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.36% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.36% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.36% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages