MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Kia » Picanto » 2010

Kia Picanto MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.9% pass rate
from 14,315 tests in 2021
(9.4% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Picanto is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Plate brake tester (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0070% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake linings and pads (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs and drums (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.056% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.035% fail on Cable
        • 0.014% fail on Lever
        • 0.0070% fail on Linkage
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.035% fail on Pedal (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.028% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0070% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.042% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.021% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
      • 0.0070% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.0070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0070% fail on Operation
  • 12% fail on Suspension (12% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Springs (10% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Coil springs (10% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Coil spring (10% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (14% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Suspension arm (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0070% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.049% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.021% fail on Sub-frames (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 9.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.0070% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.091% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.091% fail on Door condition
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
      • 0.014% fail on Front passenger's door (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.084% fail on Body
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component
      • 0.021% fail on Panel
    • 0.049% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0070% fail on Tank
      • 0.0070% fail on System
    • 0.035% fail on Seats
      • 0.028% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0070% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.028% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0070% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0070% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0070% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.73% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Switch (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on All direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.091% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.056% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0070% fail on Switch
    • 0.063% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.063% fail on Switch
    • 0.0070% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0070% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.056% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.056% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0070% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.13% fail on Compression ignition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.014% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (97% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.0070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0070% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0070% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.73% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0070% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Steering linkage components (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Track rod end (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0070% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0070% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.056% fail on Power steering
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
      • 0.021% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
    • 0.0070% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0070% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Seat belts (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Condition (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.056% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.014% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.014% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.014% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0070% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0070% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Kia Picanto (2004 - 2011)
    Great value small car that is cheap to buy and run. Seven-year warranty on all new models from January 2010. Good rear passenger room. Much improved interior on facelifted cars from 2007.

    Search Good Garages