Kia Niro MOT Results
Registered in 201789.3% pass rate
from 4,434 tests in 2021
(17% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Niro is unusually good or bad.
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(36% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.023% fail on Size/type
-
2.7% fail on
Visibility
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.47% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.090% fail on Windscreen
-
1.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.45% fail on
Direction indicators
(84% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(84% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.45% fail on
Flashing type
(84% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.11% fail on
Headlamps
(78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.045% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.045% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.023% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.023% fail on Horn
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
(39% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Brake performance
(97% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt
-
0.29% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.023% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.023% fail on
Rbt
- 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.023% fail on
Rbt
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.16% fail on Lever
-
0.11% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(95% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Brake pads (95% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.045% fail on Pedal
- 0.045% fail on Hand lever
- 0.045% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.045% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.023% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.023% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.95% fail on
Brake performance
(97% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.045% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.045% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.023% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.023% fail on Undertray
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.068% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Transmission
-
0.023% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.023% fail on Joints
-
0.023% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.023% fail on Joints
-
0.023% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.11% fail on Registration plates
-
0.068% fail on
Suspension
(92% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.023% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.023% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.023% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.045% fail on
Steering
-
0.023% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.023% fail on Steering rack
-
0.023% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.023% fail on Track rod end
-
0.023% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.023% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.023% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.023% fail on Condition
-
0.023% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.023% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.023% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Kia Niro (2016 - 2021)
Easy to drive. Impressive fuel economy and low running costs. Space for a family.