Kia Magentis MOT Results

Registered in 2010

60.8% pass rate

from 148 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Magentis is unusually good or bad.

17% fail on Suspension
- 11% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Suspension arm (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Ball joint
  - 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.68% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.68% fail on Springs
  - 0.68% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.68% fail on Coil spring
13% fail on Brakes
- 6.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.4% fail on Rbt
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.4% fail on Rbt
      - 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
  - 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.0% fail on Brake discs
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake control (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Hand lever (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.4% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 6.8% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.68% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
6.1% fail on Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
6.1% fail on Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
    - 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.68% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.68% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.68% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.68% fail on Airbags
  - 0.68% fail on Drivers airbag
2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
2.0% fail on Steering
- 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.0% fail on Track rod end
0.68% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.68% fail on Exhaust system
0.68% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment