Kia Cee'd MOT Results
Registered in 201681.3% pass rate
from 9,986 tests in 2021
(9.0% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Cee'd is unusually good or bad.
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
(22% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Wipers (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers
-
0.090% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.090% fail on Windscreen
-
0.040% fail on
View to rear
- 0.040% fail on Mirrors
- 0.010% fail on Driver's view
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
(21% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition (19% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth (22% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(15% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.98% fail on
Headlamps
(36% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Headlamp (49% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.010% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.57% fail on
Direction indicators
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Flashing type
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.57% fail on
Flashing type
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (48% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.040% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.030% fail on Position lamp
- 0.010% fail on All position lamps
-
0.030% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.020% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.010% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.010% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.40% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
(61% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
(45% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
(45% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.080% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
- 0.090% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
- 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake performance
(42% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.020% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.010% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.010% fail on Servos
-
0.010% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.010% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.010% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.010% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.010% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.010% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.010% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.050% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.050% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.030% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Coil springs
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.010% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering
-
0.30% fail on
Steering gear
(10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Steering rack (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Steering linkage components
(77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Steering play
- 0.010% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Steering gear
(10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Spark ignition
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.010% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.32% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.050% fail on
Doors
-
0.040% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.040% fail on Door condition
-
0.010% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.010% fail on Door condition
-
0.040% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.020% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.020% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Transmission
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Drive shafts
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Joints (90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Drive shafts
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Body
- 0.020% fail on Other body component
-
0.010% fail on
Seats
- 0.010% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.010% fail on Requirements
- 0.030% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.15% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.15% fail on Registration plates
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
- 0.030% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review