Kia Cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2010
63.2% pass rate
from 9,419 tests in 2017
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Cee'd is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.042% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.011% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Direction indicators (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Flashing type (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Side repeaters (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on All direction indicators (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 0.54% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Horn (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.011% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.011% fail on Lamp
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.021% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.053% fail on Brake linings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Components (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Hoses (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.011% fail on Pipes
        • 0.011% fail on Servos
      • 0.053% fail on Operation
    • 0.053% fail on ABS (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.011% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage
      • 0.011% fail on Lever
    • 0.021% fail on Service brake control components (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Condition
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Size/type
    • 0.042% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.7% fail on Suspension
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Location (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.70% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.70% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.15% fail on Front
      • 0.053% fail on Rear
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Shock absorbers (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Trailing arms (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.021% fail on Macpherson strut (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.011% fail on Component mounting
  • 7.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.085% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.75% fail on Steering (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Steering system
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Free play
        • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.021% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.021% fail on Steering control
      • 0.021% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.021% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.021% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.021% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Power steering
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
  • 0.62% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Tank (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pipe
    • 0.096% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.61% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Installation check
        • 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (58% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Body condition
    • 0.042% fail on Doors
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.011% fail on Towbars
    • 0.011% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages