Kia Cee'd MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.8% pass rate
from 10,647 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Cee'd is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.028% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.74% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0094% fail on Front fog lamp switch
    • 0.47% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.39% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.094% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Brakes (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0094% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0094% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0094% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0094% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.019% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0094% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.085% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.094% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.066% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Cable
        • 0.0094% fail on Linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.35% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0094% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.019% fail on Flexible brake hoses (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0094% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0094% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0094% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.056% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0094% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.085% fail on Sub-frame (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.056% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0094% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.038% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.028% fail on Axles
      • 0.019% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.0094% fail on Axle
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Washers (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.056% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.028% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.028% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.085% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0094% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.028% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0094% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0094% fail on Oxygen sensor
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0094% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0094% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0094% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.085% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.085% fail on Joints
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Hose
      • 0.0094% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0094% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.33% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.056% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
      • 0.047% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
      • 0.019% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0094% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0094% fail on Catch
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.066% fail on Body
      • 0.038% fail on Other body component
      • 0.019% fail on Body condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Panel
    • 0.047% fail on Seats
      • 0.038% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.019% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.028% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.019% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.019% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.0094% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.019% fail on Chassis
      • 0.019% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0094% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0094% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0094% fail on Carrier
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Steering linkage components (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Track rod end (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.056% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.30% fail on Steering gear (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Steering play
      • 0.075% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0094% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0094% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0094% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (50% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.066% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages