MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jeep » Wrangler » 2016

Jeep Wrangler MOT Results

Registered in 2016
75.3% pass rate
from 316 tests in 2021
(54% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Wrangler is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.32% fail on Switch
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.32% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 6.3% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.32% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage (50 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.95% fail on Springs
      • 0.95% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.95% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.32% fail on Axles
      • 0.32% fail on Axle
    • 0.32% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.95% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.95% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.95% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Drag link end (274 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Other components (481 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Steering component
        • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.63% fail on Fuel system (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.32% fail on System
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Transmission
      • 0.32% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.32% fail on Joints
  • 0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.95% fail on Tyres (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.32% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages