Jeep Wrangler MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.8% pass rate
from 249 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Wrangler is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 7.2% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Outline marker lamps (192 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Outline marker lamp (208 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt
          • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 1.2% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.80% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.80% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake fluid (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.40% fail on Leaks
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.0% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Axles
      • 0.40% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.8% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.0% fail on Drag link end (75 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
        • 0.40% fail on Steering component
      • 0.40% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering box
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
    • 0.40% fail on Steering column
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
  • 4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.40% fail on Carrier
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.80% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.40% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages