Jeep Wrangler MOT Results
Registered in 200066.0% pass rate
from 162 tests in 2017
(31% better than other 2000 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Wrangler is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Tell tale (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.62% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.2% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.62% fail on Lamp
- 0.62% fail on Switch
-
0.62% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.62% fail on Headlamp
- 0.62% fail on Horn
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Front wheels
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
-
6.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.9% fail on
Components
- 4.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Leaks
-
4.9% fail on
Components
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical components
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.62% fail on
Pedal
- 0.62% fail on Condition
-
0.62% fail on
Pedal
-
0.62% fail on
Hub components
- 0.62% fail on Brake pads
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.9% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.62% fail on Attachment
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.62% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.62% fail on Universal joint
-
1.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Rear
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting
-
0.62% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
7.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.62% fail on Washers
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
- 2.5% fail on Steering box (68 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Steering damper (98 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Track rod end
-
1.9% fail on
Power steering
- 0.62% fail on Operation
- 0.62% fail on Pump
- 0.62% fail on Other components
-
0.62% fail on
Steering control
-
0.62% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.62% fail on Universal joint
-
0.62% fail on
Steering coupling
-
3.7% fail on
Steering system
-
4.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Chassis
-
0.62% fail on
Seats
- 0.62% fail on Passengers
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.62% fail on Emissions
-
0.62% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.62% fail on Cap
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.62% fail on Valve stem
-
1.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.62% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.62% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.62% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.62% fail on
Towbars
- 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure