MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jeep » Wrangler » 2000

Jeep Wrangler MOT Results

Registered in 2000
59.8% pass rate
from 204 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Wrangler is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.98% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.98% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.98% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.49% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.98% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.98% fail on Joints
        • 0.49% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.98% fail on Chassis
      • 0.98% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.98% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.98% fail on Seats
      • 0.98% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.49% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.49% fail on Other body component
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on View to rear
      • 0.49% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.49% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.98% fail on Transmission oil leaks (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.49% fail on Steering box
    • 0.49% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.98% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages