Jeep Wrangler MOT Results

Registered in 1997
60.6% pass rate
from 264 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Wrangler is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.76% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.38% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 0.76% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.76% fail on Lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 12% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front
      • 0.76% fail on Rear
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting (78% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.38% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.76% fail on Front drive shafts (79% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.38% fail on Couplings
      • 0.76% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Universal joint (61 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Panhard rods (18 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (27 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.38% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment
    • 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (69% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Components (66% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 6.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.5% fail on Steering damper (40 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.38% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.38% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.38% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.38% fail on Operation
      • 0.38% fail on Drive system
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.76% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Requirements
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.76% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (77% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Body condition
    • 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
  • 0.38% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages