MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jeep » Renegade » 2016

Jeep Renegade MOT Results

Registered in 2016
83.1% pass rate
from 10,605 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Renegade is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (13% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (60% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (31% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.52% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.0094% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.028% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.019% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.019% fail on Horn
    • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.019% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.0094% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0094% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.0094% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.93% fail on Spark ignition (98% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.0094% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0094% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0094% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0094% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.019% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0094% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.6% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.46% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.028% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.028% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.028% fail on Parking brake control (75% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.028% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0094% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0094% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0094% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.0094% fail on Electronic braking system
  • 1.4% fail on Visibility (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Wipers (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.066% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.038% fail on View to rear
      • 0.038% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.64% fail on Suspension (69% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0094% fail on Linkage
    • 0.19% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes (77% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.085% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.038% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frame
  • 0.42% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.12% fail on Transmission
      • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.085% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Drive shaft (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.0094% fail on Joints
        • 0.0094% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.085% fail on Doors
      • 0.047% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
      • 0.028% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0094% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0094% fail on Door condition
    • 0.075% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.047% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.019% fail on Pipe
      • 0.019% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0094% fail on Tank
    • 0.047% fail on Seats
      • 0.038% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0094% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.019% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0094% fail on Body
      • 0.0094% fail on Panel
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.0094% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0094% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Jeep Renegade (2015 on)
    Small yet impressively spacious SUV. Good quality interior. Refined and quiet even at speed. Usefully large boot and wide opening rear doors.

    Search Good Garages