Jeep Patriot MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.8% pass rate
from 544 tests in 2017
(55% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Patriot is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 18% fail on Suspension arms (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 6.6% fail on Front suspension joints (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment (56 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tie bars/rods (60 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.37% fail on Radius arms (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.37% fail on Front
    • 0.37% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.37% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.18% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Component mounting
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.37% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.55% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.55% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on ABS (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake operation (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability system (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Restricted movement (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Components
        • 0.37% fail on Hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.5% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.55% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.55% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
  • 0.18% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages