Jeep Patriot MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.8% pass rate
from 408 tests in 2017
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Patriot is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 16% fail on Suspension arms (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 6.1% fail on Front suspension joints (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Trailing arms (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Tie bars/rods (35 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Front
      • 0.74% fail on Rear
    • 0.98% fail on Radius arms (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Sub-frames (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Condition (59 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.74% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.74% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.25% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas (41 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Component mounting (77 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Torque/reaction arms (87 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Front lamps (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.49% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Horn
    • 0.25% fail on Battery
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 13% fail on Brakes (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on ABS (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Electronic stability system (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.74% fail on Components
        • 0.49% fail on Hoses
        • 0.25% fail on Pipes
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.49% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.98% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on System (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
    • 0.25% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.98% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.98% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.98% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages