Jeep Patriot MOT Results
Registered in 200948.8% pass rate
from 408 tests in 2017
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Patriot is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
- 6.1% fail on Front suspension joints (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
-
2.9% fail on
Trailing arms
(13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
2.9% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(35 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Front
- 0.74% fail on Rear
-
0.98% fail on
Radius arms
(37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Sub-frames
(14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Condition (59 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.74% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.74% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.25% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.74% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.74% fail on
Prescribed areas
(41 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Component mounting (77 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(87 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension arms
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Front lamps (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rear lamps
- 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.74% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.25% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.74% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.49% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.49% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Battery
- 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.25% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.25% fail on Lamp
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(99% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.6% fail on ABS (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
3.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Front wheels
- 0.25% fail on Brake operation
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 1.7% fail on Electronic stability system (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.74% fail on
Components
- 0.49% fail on Hoses
- 0.25% fail on Pipes
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
0.74% fail on
Components
-
0.49% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.49% fail on
Pedal
- 0.49% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Pedal
- 0.49% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.49% fail on Valve stem
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
- 0.25% fail on Mirrors
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Free play
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.98% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on System (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pipe
- 0.25% fail on Cap
- 0.25% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.25% fail on Emissions
- 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.98% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.98% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.98% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.74% fail on Condition
-
0.98% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.98% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Patriot (2007 - 2011)
Value for money. Plenty of kit. Decent drive on the road and very capable off it.