Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 201174.6% pass rate
from 240 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.83% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.42% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.42% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.83% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.83% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.42% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.42% fail on Position lamp
-
0.42% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.42% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
5.0% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (22 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.42% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.83% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.83% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.42% fail on Hand lever
- 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.42% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.42% fail on Brake pads
-
0.42% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.42% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.83% fail on Condition
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension
(74% better than other 2011 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Springs
(82% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.42% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.42% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.83% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
-
0.42% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.83% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.42% fail on
Seats
- 0.42% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.42% fail on Undertray
-
0.83% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.42% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.42% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.42% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.83% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.83% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.83% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.83% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.83% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.42% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
-
0.42% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review