Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results
Registered in 200564.8% pass rate
from 857 tests in 2021
(21% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
(140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Horn
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.23% fail on Position lamp
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.47% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.70% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.93% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Axles
- 0.12% fail on Axle
-
0.12% fail on
Springs
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.12% fail on Coil spring
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.12% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake performance
(78% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Rbt
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.93% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.93% fail on Brake discs
-
0.12% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(93% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Rigid brake pipes (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.82% fail on Lever
-
0.47% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Pedal
-
0.35% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.12% fail on Valves
- 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.12% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
-
0.35% fail on
View to rear
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Driver's view
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
2.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Catalyst emissions (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
5.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.4% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.58% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Steering arm
-
0.47% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.47% fail on Steering rack
-
0.35% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.12% fail on Rams
-
4.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(72% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(38% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Joints (47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.23% fail on Joints
-
1.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (51% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.47% fail on
Chassis
- 0.47% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.47% fail on
Seats
- 0.47% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.23% fail on Tank
- 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.35% fail on
Body
- 0.23% fail on Panel
- 0.12% fail on Body condition
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.23% fail on Bumpers
-
0.12% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.12% fail on Carrier
-
0.12% fail on
Load security
- 0.12% fail on Access panel
- 0.12% fail on Undertray
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.93% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Tyres
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
0.93% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.93% fail on Attachment
-
0.58% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.58% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Jeep Grand Cherokee (2005 - 2011)
Bold and chunky styling, excellent 3.0 CRD diesel engine, superbly capable off-road, well equipped as standard, good-sized boot, great for towing.